<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retrospectives IN and ON action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/</link>
	<description>scattered thoughts of a wannabe thinker</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: naisioxerloro</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-9049</link>
		<dc:creator>naisioxerloro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-9049</guid>
		<description>Hi. 
Good design, who make it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Good design, who make it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Business Acumen &#171; BrainScrum</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Business Acumen &#171; BrainScrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>[...] are supposed to apply an approach sort of &#8220;by the book&#8221; before starting to change it (through retrospectives, of course! ;-)). This is also why people talk about Shu Ha Ri as a way to approach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are supposed to apply an approach sort of &#8220;by the book&#8221; before starting to change it (through retrospectives, of course! ;-)). This is also why people talk about Shu Ha Ri as a way to approach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codentropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Know your Team</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Codentropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Know your Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently I have read an interesting Marco’s post that get the point. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently I have read an interesting Marco’s post that get the point. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codentropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conoscere il proprio Team</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Codentropy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conoscere il proprio Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Recentemente proprio su quest&#8217;ultimo punto ho letto un interessante post di Marco. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recentemente proprio su quest&#8217;ultimo punto ho letto un interessante post di Marco. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronica R.</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronica R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I also am a Scrum person. Because Scrum/agile are at their core empirical processes, learning is built in throughout. So, yes, there is a formal retrospective at the end. But there are also the daily meetings, an emphasis on an open work setting that fosters constant communication, a tendency toward many prototypings/demos/other feedback points with users. Also, each iteration provides a reflection point at the end, but really these are intermediate reflection points to the real end, which is a release.

My point here is that agile processes already do provide many points of retrospective IN action. Furthermore, and I suspect this is where you are really going with this idea, practicing scrum/agile does put team members into a habit of reflection, retrospective, and learning. Therefore, team members find more opportunities for feedback and adjustment.

Maybe the next question is: is there such a thing as too much retrospective IN action? Can it cause you to change course too easily, or to fail to give an idea a chance to work? Or does that very question imply an over-thinking of what is really a simple process of collaboration, which is different from real retrospective, which is what we--in scrum--do every two weeks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also am a Scrum person. Because Scrum/agile are at their core empirical processes, learning is built in throughout. So, yes, there is a formal retrospective at the end. But there are also the daily meetings, an emphasis on an open work setting that fosters constant communication, a tendency toward many prototypings/demos/other feedback points with users. Also, each iteration provides a reflection point at the end, but really these are intermediate reflection points to the real end, which is a release.</p>
<p>My point here is that agile processes already do provide many points of retrospective IN action. Furthermore, and I suspect this is where you are really going with this idea, practicing scrum/agile does put team members into a habit of reflection, retrospective, and learning. Therefore, team members find more opportunities for feedback and adjustment.</p>
<p>Maybe the next question is: is there such a thing as too much retrospective IN action? Can it cause you to change course too easily, or to fail to give an idea a chance to work? Or does that very question imply an over-thinking of what is really a simple process of collaboration, which is different from real retrospective, which is what we&#8211;in scrum&#8211;do every two weeks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H.</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>David H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Hello.

I would like to say that this is a wonderful post. Since you wanted some feedback from a Scrum person, I thought I should add one thought. In a retrospective I also enjoy to reinforce the strenghts a Scrum team has shown. This could also mean that individual strenghts are shown to the team, exposed and carefully taking into account for ones own register. That means that I usually pay a lot attention to even make the "bad things" sound good. That is when "What went wrong" beacomes "What should be improved". I think it is very important to set a positive tone to all of this.

Apart from that retrospectives should fit in with the work culture of the company and the team. I have also learned, that removing the team from their actual work environment helps to lighten the mood and open them up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.</p>
<p>I would like to say that this is a wonderful post. Since you wanted some feedback from a Scrum person, I thought I should add one thought. In a retrospective I also enjoy to reinforce the strenghts a Scrum team has shown. This could also mean that individual strenghts are shown to the team, exposed and carefully taking into account for ones own register. That means that I usually pay a lot attention to even make the &#8220;bad things&#8221; sound good. That is when &#8220;What went wrong&#8221; beacomes &#8220;What should be improved&#8221;. I think it is very important to set a positive tone to all of this.</p>
<p>Apart from that retrospectives should fit in with the work culture of the company and the team. I have also learned, that removing the team from their actual work environment helps to lighten the mood and open them up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maksim</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Maksim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 02:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agree that reflection is a very important factor in building teams and continuous learning.  However self reflection can sometime be misleading and may re-enforce non-productive behaviors.  It's important to gather high quality 360 degree feedback, ( i.e. Clients, Developers, Sponsors, Stakeholders... ) and  look at the whole picture and not the first thing that comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agree that reflection is a very important factor in building teams and continuous learning.  However self reflection can sometime be misleading and may re-enforce non-productive behaviors.  It&#8217;s important to gather high quality 360 degree feedback, ( i.e. Clients, Developers, Sponsors, Stakeholders&#8230; ) and  look at the whole picture and not the first thing that comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJN</title>
		<link>http://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>DJN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 07:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brainscrum.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/retrospectives-in-and-on-action/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>"Reflecting on experience provides the basis for forming more abstract ideas which can then be applied and tested in further experience. It enables us recognise new opportunities and learn from them." 

I agree 110%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reflecting on experience provides the basis for forming more abstract ideas which can then be applied and tested in further experience. It enables us recognise new opportunities and learn from them.&#8221; </p>
<p>I agree 110%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
